Loss of Earning Capacity vs An Actual Patrimonial Loss
Welcome to the thirtieth edition of Independent Actuaries & Consultant’s (IAC’s) monthly newsletter.
IAC Training 2012 – Time Management Workshop for all supporting staff
Based on the lack of response regarding the training seminar on how to work with the IAC blog we have decided not to proceed with same.
However, in line with our ethos of adding value to our clients business, we are looking at presenting a time management workshop aimed at equipping your supporting staff (personal assistants, office managers, legal secretaries, typists and article clerks) to better manage their time and your resources thereby increasing productivity.
The workshop will take place during the July 2012 recess, depending on your response.
Please indicate via return mail whether you are interested and how many people from your firm might attend.
LOSS OF EARNING CAPACITY vs AN ACTUAL PATRIMONIAL LOSS – Mvundle v Road Accident Fund (63500/2009)  ZAGPPHC 57 (17 April 2012)
The plaintiff, the driver of a Mercedes-Benz bus, was involved in a motor vehicle collision. As a result of the collision the plaintiff sustained the following injuries: soft tissue injury of the scalp, neck, shoulder and ankle; loss of 50% of his sight to the left eye and emotional trauma.
The Plaintiff was employed as a professional driver for most of his working life. His claim for loss of earning capacity was based on him no longer being physically able to drive because of the shoulder injury, loss of sight in his left eye and head injuries sustained in the accident.
In considering the claim the court held that it’s trite law that any claim in respect of future loss of earnings / earning capacity requires:
“36.1 A loss of earning capacity as a result of a damage causing event; and
36.2 An actual patrimonial loss of income as a result of the above mentioned loss of earning capacity. In which case, either the one or the other may be claimed for the same amount.”
The court further held as trite that damages for loss of income can be granted where a person has in fact suffered or will suffer a true patrimonial loss in that his or her employment situation has manifestly changed. The plaintiff’s performance can also influence his patrimony if there was a possibility that he could lose his current job and be limited in the number and quality of his choices should he decide to find other employment.
In casu the honourable Judge found that had the plaintiff remained in his erstwhile employment he would not have succeeded in his claim for loss of earnings / earning capacity. But because he left the job, irrespective of what the cause was, he must be compensated if he could establish that but for the accident he was no longer fit to drive and that his choices, either in number or quality, of finding alternative employment were now limited and his chances of retraining for a new career were negatively affected.
Sending us an Instruction
Our dedicated full time professional team receive instructions by any of the following means:
• Email : firstname.lastname@example.org, or
• Post : PO Box 1172, Cape Town, 8000
• Fax : 086 616 8308
Now for a joke –
Q: What’s the difference between a lawyer and a herd of buffalo?
A: The lawyer charges more